Home > Security > There's Content In Them Thar Hills

There's Content In Them Thar Hills

Given the amount of
press
that Ye Olde Napster seems to dredge up
for its sins, one would thing more attention might be paid to
how hyperactively
reshared mass media has become. There are
still authoritative sources of high
quality news, but more and more I’m realizing that the “online experience” of
that news might actually be less fulfilling than the “dead tree product”.

After all, it may a pain to dispose of the newspaper, but:

  1. It can’t be ignored(or more accurately, ignore it for a few days and it
    piles up, reminding you of your own wastefulness).

  2. It can’t be unpublished, and it *will* be archived.
  3. It’s much easier on your eyes(if not your arms), meaning you read more.
  4. There’s an actual profit model. (sigh)

That being said, there are some truly unique things that the net really does
enable. Usually, the more domain specific a given piece of work is, the
harder it is to acquire(since the generalized stores won’t waste space on
what appeals to very few). The net alleviates that, but suffers a different
problem: Due to the lack of a profit model, after a certain point, it’s
all too easy for a site to simply not scale to large amounts of traffic and to
have no way of improving scalability. This was the problem the
absolutely incredible
ZZZ Online
faced, after
being temporarily(but repeatedly) raised from a slightly obscure but technically
unparalleled journal of upcoming technologies to a “geek mass market”
Slashdot destination. They lost their
provider as a result of the crushing load–an embarassment of riches, if
anyone was actually getting rich!

Honestly, there’s a decent question of
whether traditional unicast methodologies(even when multiplied by
highly distributed middlemen) actually
can or should be made to scale to broadcast-sized audiences. P2P will
inevitably be sold to the few remaining VC’s with money to burn as the solution
to these problems, and indeed
leveraging network locality of one’s clients
while maintaining stream integrity

is very likely to be an effective strategy…at least
until high speed upload at the client side becomes buried by provider
centralization and possibly legal challenges(i.e. “why would anyone want to
send data that they didn’t steal from us?”
).

In the end, it’s going to be Yet Another Battle, with the
“Consumer Movement”
probably winning more converts from the
“Napster Constituen
cy”

than they ever imagined.

Categories: Security
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: